COMMENTARY
The Pedestal Problem: Why Blind Trust in Police Enables Corruption
A Sanford Officer's 80-Count Arrest Shows What Happens When We Stop Scrutinizing
Published on by Attorney Jeff Lotter
We have a tendency in this country to put police officers on a pedestal. We treat the badge as a guarantee of integrity. But that unquestioning trust creates exactly the environment where bad actors thrive.
The Case That Proves the Point
On December 16, 2025, Sanford Police Officer Ronny Neal was arrested on 80 felony charges: 79 counts of official misconduct and one count of organized fraud.
Neal wasn't some rookie who slipped through the cracks. He was a 22-year veteran of the department. And his position? Investigator in the Professional Standards Unit—the unit responsible for investigating other officers.
"He was our lie detector guy. Imagine that."
— Police Chief Cecil Smith
For approximately 11 months—from October 2023 through July 2024—Neal allegedly created fictitious off-duty security details at an apartment complex. He fabricated invoices for work he never performed, then submitted them to the city for payment. The scheme netted him at least five figures before anyone noticed.
The apartment complex had no contract with him. The shifts never happened. And yet, for nearly a year, the checks kept coming.
The Real Problem: The Pedestal
How does a fraud scheme run undetected for 11 months? The same way misconduct survives in any organization: when no one is looking.
We've built a culture where questioning police is seen as disrespectful, unpatriotic, or anti-law-enforcement. Asking for body camera footage makes you difficult. Requesting documentation of an officer's training makes you a defense attorney "playing games." Challenging an officer's testimony means you don't support the thin blue line.
But here's the uncomfortable truth: the pedestal we put officers on creates the perfect cover for the corrupt ones.
The Gap We Create
When we treat questioning an officer as inherently wrong, we create a wide gap where the criminal element inside police departments can operate freely. The ones who exploit the badge know that their colleagues—and the public—are unlikely to second-guess them.
Neal wasn't caught by internal oversight. He wasn't caught by fellow officers. He was caught because the city finance department noticed unpaid vendor accounts that didn't add up. A bookkeeper caught what years of institutional trust failed to uncover.
What This Means for You
If you're facing criminal charges, the officer who arrested you, who wrote the report, who will testify against you—that officer deserves the same scrutiny as any other witness.
Officers Can Lie
Neal submitted false documents for 11 months. He was the department's polygraph examiner—the person trusted to detect lies. Officers are human beings, capable of the same dishonesty as anyone else. The badge doesn't change that.
Officers Can Make Mistakes
Beyond intentional misconduct, officers misremember details, misinterpret events, and make honest errors. Treating their accounts as infallible doesn't serve justice—it undermines it.
Scrutiny Protects Everyone
Holding officers accountable isn't anti-police. It protects the integrity of the honest officers who make up the majority of any department. It protects the public from those who would abuse their authority. And it protects the justice system itself.
The Solution: More Scrutiny, Not Less
The answer isn't to assume all officers are corrupt. That's as wrong as assuming none are. The answer is to apply the same standards of scrutiny we'd apply to anyone else in a position of power.
What Accountability Looks Like
- Body camera footage should be produced in every case—not treated as optional
- Officer testimony should be corroborated by evidence, not accepted on faith
- Training records, calibration logs, and supporting documentation should be standard discovery
- Complaints against officers should be tracked and disclosed
- Internal affairs investigations should be transparent, not buried
Chief Smith said he felt "betrayed and disgusted" by Neal's conduct. That's the right reaction. But betrayal only happens when trust was given without verification. The goal should be a system where verification is built in—where trust is earned and maintained through transparency, not assumed and exploited.
What This Means for Criminal Defense
As a criminal defense attorney, my job isn't to assume officers are lying. It's to verify. To request the body camera footage. To demand the calibration records. To cross-examine testimony against the documented evidence.
That's not being anti-police. That's being pro-justice.
When an officer's account holds up under scrutiny, it strengthens the case. When it doesn't, my client deserves to know that. Either way, the process works better when everyone is held to the same standard.
80 Felony Charges
Against a 22-year veteran. The Professional Standards investigator. "The lie detector guy."
If this officer's word had been taken at face value in criminal cases, how many defendants would have been convicted on testimony we now know came from a fraudster?
The Bottom Line
Ronny Neal's arrest isn't an indictment of all police officers. Most officers serve honorably. But his case is a stark reminder of what happens when we place any profession beyond scrutiny.
The pedestal doesn't protect us. It protects the ones who would exploit our trust.
Real respect for law enforcement means holding officers to the high standards the job demands—not exempting them from accountability.
We don't need to tear officers down. We need to stop building them up so high that no one can see what they're doing.
Related Articles
Facing Criminal Charges?
You deserve a defense attorney who will verify every claim, demand every document, and hold the State to its burden of proof. The badge doesn't make testimony true—evidence does.
Free Consultation | Evidence-Based Defense | Results That Matter
Law Office of Jeff Lotter PLLC
Serving Orlando, Orange County, and Central Florida