Strategic Pre-Trial Motions
A Critical Step in Your Criminal Defense
Former State Trooper | Former Deputy Sheriff | Proven Results
Request a Free ConsultationUnderstanding Pre-Trial Motions
Pre-trial motions are applications made to the court by the prosecutor or defense attorney requesting a decision on a specific issue before the trial begins. These motions can influence various aspects of the case, including the evidence presented, potentially leading to charges being reduced or even dismissed.
1. Motion to Suppress Evidence
Purpose: A formal legal request asking the court to exclude certain evidence from trial. This is done because the evidence is argued to have been obtained in violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights or Florida law. If the court grants the motion, the prosecution cannot use the suppressed evidence.
Legal Basis: This motion is a powerful tool rooted in the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures and is a logical outgrowth of the Exclusionary Rule. The Exclusionary Rule allows for the suppression of evidence obtained unlawfully and applies to violations of the 4th, 5th (right to remain silent), and 6th (right to counsel) Amendments. In Florida, motions to suppress are governed by Rule 3.190(g) and 3.190(h) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Grounds for Filing: A motion to suppress must be based on a constitutional or procedural violation by law enforcement. Common grounds include:
- Illegal searches and seizures without a valid warrant or legal justification.
- Unlawful traffic stops or detentions not based on reasonable suspicion or probable cause.
- Defective search warrants that are invalid or based on false information.
- Improper inventory searches of vehicles after towing or impoundment.
Types of Evidence Subject to Suppression:
- Physical Evidence: Tangible items seized during searches of places (houses, vehicles) or people. This type of motion is used when it is argued that the search and seizure violated constitutional rights.
- Confessions or Admissions (Statements): A defendant's own statements, discussed further below.
- Eyewitness Identification: Pretrial identification of the defendant, discussed further below.
Process: The defense attorney files a written motion specifying the evidence to be suppressed and the legal reason for suppression. A pre-trial hearing is held where both sides present arguments. The defense has the burden to show a constitutional violation occurred. The judge then issues a ruling.
Impact: A successful motion to suppress can significantly weaken the prosecution's case and may lead to charges being reduced or dismissed, particularly if key evidence is excluded. When it leads to complete dismissal, it's called a "Dispositive Motion to Suppress".
2. Motion to Suppress Statements (Confessions or Admissions)
Purpose: Used to argue that a defendant's confession or admission was not voluntarily or freely given and should be excluded from evidence.
Legal Basis: Generally based on violations of the Fifth Amendment right to remain silent and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel.
Grounds for Filing: Filed when statements were allegedly obtained illegally, often due to:
- Failure to administer Miranda rights: If police conduct a custodial interrogation without first informing the suspect of their Miranda rights, anything the suspect says may be inadmissible. Miranda rights include the right to remain silent, that anything said can be used against them, the right to an attorney during questioning, and the right to a court-appointed attorney if indigent.
- Coercion: If police coerce a defendant through force, deprivation, threats, or promises, a confession can be considered involuntary.
Challenging Voluntariness: Courts consider factors like the nature and extent of deception, the length and conditions of the interrogation, the suspect's age, education, and mental condition, and whether Miranda rights were properly given and honored when assessing if a confession was voluntary.
Impact: If granted, the statements cannot be used against the defendant at trial, which can weaken the prosecution's case.
3. Motion to Dismiss
Purpose: A pretrial mechanism to terminate a criminal prosecution through court action due to some legal or technical defect in the proceedings. It is the proper method for raising most defenses other than "not guilty".
Legal Basis: Governed by Rule 3.190 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Grounds for Filing: Can be filed for a wide range of legal issues, including:
- Statute of limitations violations.
- Where the defendant has been pardoned, previously placed in jeopardy (double jeopardy), or granted immunity.
- Failure to establish a prima facie case of guilt (factual insufficiencies) where there are no material disputed facts.
- Discovery violations, prosecutorial misconduct, or due process violations.
- Unconstitutionality of the charging statute or failure to state a criminal offense in the charging document (fundamental grounds).
- Speedy trial expiration.
Requirements: The motion must be in writing, signed, state specific grounds, be served, and be sworn to by the defendant, alleging undisputed material facts that either fail to establish a prima facie case or demonstrate a valid legal defense.
What it is NOT: It is not a way to resolve factual disputes, weigh evidence, or assess witness credibility. It is not a substitute for trial.
Timing: Must generally be filed before or at arraignment, with specific exceptions that allow it to be heard at any time, such as double jeopardy or lack of prima facie case with undisputed facts.
Prosecution's Response (Rule 3.190(c)(4) factual motions): If the defendant files a motion based on undisputed facts showing no prima facie case, the state can file a Traverse (specifically denying a material fact or presenting additional facts showing a prima facie case) or a Demurrer (accepting the facts but arguing they still amount to guilt). A legally sufficient traverse results in automatic denial of the motion.
How Law Firms Use These Motions to Get Results for Clients
Experienced criminal defense attorneys strategically use pre-trial motions like motions to suppress and motions to dismiss as powerful tools to protect their clients' rights and achieve favorable outcomes.
- Challenging Legality and Identifying Violations: Attorneys meticulously examine every aspect of the case, from the initial police interaction to searches, seizures, and interrogations, to identify potential constitutional or procedural violations. They are ready to challenge the legality of searches and seizures and question police procedures.
- Suppressing Evidence: A primary goal of motions to suppress is to exclude unlawfully obtained evidence from being used against the defendant at trial. This includes evidence from illegal searches, involuntary confessions, or flawed identifications. Challenging improper inventory searches is one specific way attorneys seek to suppress evidence.
- Weakening the Prosecution's Case: Excluding key evidence through a successful motion significantly weakens the prosecution's ability to meet its burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
- Seeking Dismissals or Reduced Charges: When critical evidence is suppressed, the prosecution's case may be so weakened that they have "no choice but to drop the charges". Attorneys leverage successful suppression motions to pursue complete dismissals of charges or negotiate reduced charges or favorable plea deals. Motions to dismiss based on legal or technical defects can also directly result in the termination of the case pretrial.
- Exposing Misconduct: Filing motions can expose police misconduct or constitutional violations.
- Strengthening Defense Strategy: Even if a motion does not lead to dismissal, excluding certain damaging evidence can significantly improve the defendant's position and build a stronger defense strategy for trial.
- Advocating for Clients: Attorneys emphasize that these challenges are crucial because illegal procedures or evidence won't automatically be excluded; they require someone to challenge them. Lawyers are committed to defending clients' rights and ensuring unlawfully obtained evidence is suppressed, thereby upholding the principles of justice and the rule of law.
Ready to Discuss Your Case?
Contact Lotter Law today for a free, confidential consultation. Let our experience work for you.
Or, reach us directly:
Law Office of Jeff Lotter PLLC | 200 E Robinson St Suite 1140, Orlando, FL 32801