When a Car Crash Looks Like DUI: How Crash Trauma Creates Reasonable Doubt

By Jeff Lotter, Criminal Defense Attorney |
Case Result DUI Defense Trial
Crash Trauma vs. DUI Defense - Lotter Law
Crash trauma symptoms can mimic alcohol impairment -- creating reasonable doubt in DUI cases

You survive a car crash. Your vehicle is overturned. Emergency crews arrive. You're bleeding, shaking, disoriented. Then a law enforcement officer approaches -- not to check on you, but to investigate you for DUI. Every symptom you're experiencing from the crash looks exactly like alcohol impairment to the officer writing the report.

This scenario plays out regularly in Central Florida. And it leads to DUI arrests that never should have happened. The problem is that crash trauma and alcohol impairment produce identical observable symptoms. When officers can't tell the difference -- and don't account for the crash itself -- innocent people get charged. But when a defense attorney forces the jury to consider both explanations, the result can be very different.

The Problem: Crash Symptoms Look Exactly Like Intoxication

Officers are trained to look for specific "indicators of impairment" during a DUI investigation. But nearly every indicator on their checklist has an equally valid medical explanation after a car crash.

What the Officer Observes vs. What's Actually Happening

Symptom Alcohol Explanation Crash Explanation
Bloodshot, watery eyes Alcohol consumption Dust, airbag chemicals, crying, debris
Slurred speech Impairment Shock, head trauma, stress, fatigue
Unsteady on feet Impaired balance Leg injuries, knee injuries, shock
Orbital sway Alcohol effects Inner ear disruption, head trauma
Confusion Intoxication Concussion, shock, adrenaline crash
Slow responses Impairment Pain, exhaustion, shock
Shivering, trembling -- Shock response (even in warm weather)

Every single observation an officer makes after a crash can be explained by two competing theories: alcohol impairment or crash trauma. When the evidence supports both explanations equally, the law requires a verdict of not guilty.

Why Even Sober Drivers "Fail" Field Sobriety Exercises After a Crash

Field sobriety exercises are designed to test divided attention -- your ability to balance, follow instructions, and coordinate movements simultaneously. But these tests assume a baseline: a person who is physically uninjured, mentally calm, and standing on a level surface. A crash victim meets none of those conditions.

Physical Injuries Compromise Every Test

The Shock Response Changes Everything

After a serious crash, the body's sympathetic nervous system activates a fight-or-flight response. This produces measurable physiological changes:

These are the exact same "clues" officers are trained to look for during DUI investigations. The difference is the cause.

The Time Gap Factor

There's a critical detail most people overlook: when the officer makes observations matters enormously. Crash effects don't improve with time -- they often get worse. Adrenaline wears off 30-60 minutes after the crash, causing an "adrenaline crash" that produces fatigue, confusion, and unsteadiness. If the officer arrives 30-40 minutes after the crash and administers field sobriety exercises 45 minutes after that, the person's condition reflects crash trauma plus time -- not impairment at the time of driving.

The Legal Standard: When Two Explanations Exist

Florida law is clear on this point. When the State's case rests on circumstantial evidence -- and in crash DUI cases, it almost always does -- the evidence must be inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence. If the evidence is equally consistent with innocence as with guilt, the jury must acquit.

The Circumstantial Evidence Standard

Where the only proof of guilt is circumstantial, a conviction cannot be sustained unless the evidence is inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence. Medical impairment from a car crash is a reasonable hypothesis of innocence. If the State cannot eliminate it, the jury should find reasonable doubt.

This is the heart of the medical impairment defense. The defense attorney doesn't need to prove the defendant was sober. The defense only needs to show that crash trauma is a reasonable alternative explanation for the symptoms the officer observed. If it is, the State hasn't met its burden.

Real Case: Jury Acquittal on the Medical Impairment Defense

We recently took a DUI case to jury trial where the medical impairment defense was the central argument. Here are the facts:

What Happened

  • A three-vehicle crash -- our client's vehicle was overturned
  • A third vehicle had cut our client off, causing an evasive maneuver that led to the crash
  • The responding officer arrived 40 minutes after the crash
  • Our client was found exiting an ambulance, not the vehicle
  • Field sobriety exercises were administered 85 minutes after the crash
  • Our client had bleeding knees and was visibly shivering
  • The officer noted "orbital sway," slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes
  • Our client refused the breath test -- there was no BAC number
  • Medical attention was required -- our client was ordered to the hospital

The Defense

Every observation the officer documented had an alternative explanation:

During cross-examination, the arresting officer acknowledged having received substantially more training since the date of the arrest -- an implicit admission that the investigation may not have met current standards.

Result: NOT GUILTY

The jury returned a verdict of not guilty. They found reasonable doubt because the State could not prove that the symptoms the officer observed were caused by alcohol rather than crash trauma. Every piece of evidence was equally consistent with innocence.

Key Factors That Strengthen a Crash DUI Defense

Not every crash DUI case is the same, but certain factors consistently strengthen the medical impairment argument:

What Makes This Defense Stronger

  • Time gap -- The longer between the crash and the officer's observations, the more likely symptoms reflect crash trauma, not driving-time impairment
  • Documented injuries -- Bleeding, visible injuries, and medical transport all support the trauma explanation
  • Medical attention required -- If the defendant was transported to a hospital or treated by EMS, it corroborates the severity of the crash
  • No breath or blood test -- Without a BAC number, the State relies entirely on officer observations -- which are all explained by the crash
  • Crash severity -- Rollovers, multi-vehicle collisions, and high-impact crashes produce more severe trauma symptoms
  • Third-party fault -- If another driver caused or contributed to the crash, it undermines the narrative that the defendant's driving was impaired

What To Do If You're Arrested for DUI After a Car Crash

If you're ever in this situation, the steps you take in the first hours can significantly affect the strength of your defense:

Arrested for DUI After a Car Crash?

Not every crash with impairment signs is a DUI. If you or someone you know was arrested for DUI following a car accident, the symptoms the officer observed may have a medical explanation that creates reasonable doubt. Contact Lotter Law for a free consultation to discuss your case.

Call (407) 500-7000 or email jeff@jlotterlaw.com

Jeff Lotter

Jeff Lotter

Criminal Defense Attorney & Former Florida State Trooper. Jeff brings a unique law enforcement perspective to criminal defense, helping clients in Orlando and Central Florida navigate the justice system.

Related Articles